How traditional, traditional and highest-condition was in fact regular members of these groups?

How traditional, traditional and highest-condition was in fact regular members of these groups?

And how much selection did they have more than the category registration? (A few things have emerged as more genetic than others-Girls Gaga’s anthem “Born That way” try adopted of the homosexuals, not hipsters.) Then he tested analysis from a nationwide election questionnaire you to definitely requested someone the political positioning and how warm or cooler their feelings was basically on people 42 groups.

Old-fashioned political opinions have been correlated which have coldness into the liberals, gays and lesbians, transgender somebody, feminists, atheists, some one towards appeal, illegal immigrants, blacks, experts, Hispanics, labor unions, Buddhists, Muslims, hippies, hipsters, Democrats, goths, immigrants, lower-group some one and you can nerds. Liberal governmental viewpoints, at exactly the same time, were correlated with coldness to the conservatives, Religious fundamentalists, steeped somebody, the fresh new Tea party, huge company, Christians, Mormons, the latest armed forces, Catholics, the authorities, males, whites, Republicans, religious people, Christians and you will upper-category somebody.

Brandt unearthed that knowing just a goal group’s perceived governmental direction (are goths named liberal or conservative?), you could expect rather precisely if liberals or conservatives tend to express far more prejudice toward him or her, and just how far. Social standing (is the category acknowledged because of the society?) and you may choice of classification membership (have been it produced in that way?) mattered absolutely nothing. It appears that contradictory political beliefs really are what drive liberal and old-fashioned prejudice to the such groups. Feminists and you can fundamentalists differ in ways, however,, as much as governmental prejudice is concerned, just one method very issues.

An additional present report, from the Record away from Personality and you may Public Mindset, Crawford, Brandt and you will acquaintances as well as learned that people were particularly biased facing people who stored other personal, in place of financial, governmental ideologies-possibly because cultural situations search far more visceral compared to those you to involve spreadsheets.

And you may, not surprisingly, closed-oriented individuals were way more biased than discover-minded anybody facing “unconventional” teams like atheists, Democrats, the poor, and gays and you can lesbians

Not one in the, however, teaches you as to why liberals’ discover-mindedness will not most readily useful include them against bias. That idea is that the outcomes of liberals’ novel qualities and worldviews into the prejudice try swamped by the an easy reality out-of humanity: We like anybody like us. You will find a long distinctive line of lookup showing we favor players of one’s class, even when the group is defined merely by the at random tasked shirt color, as a whole 2011 study receive. Personal label is actually good-stronger than any desires to get otherwise inhibits novelty. Since Brandt informed me, “The new openness-related faculties out-of liberals are not some sort of bias antidote.”

Earliest, Brandt used studies regarding Us citizens to evaluate this new observed faculties out-of 42 personal organizations, plus Democrats, Catholics, gays and lesbians and you may hipsters

Brandt subsequent speculates you to an individual’s habit of be open- or closed-oriented has an effect on your remedy for various organizations mainly from the acting as a team meaning alone-could you be an unbarred otherwise a closed? Support this concept, he and you will collaborators advertised on the Journal from Identification and you can Social Therapy into the 2015 that, regardless if openness in order to the brand new skills coordinated with all the way down prejudice up against a broad distinct sixteen personal groups, it really enhanced bias up against the extremely signed-minded teams on pile. Open-oriented someone sensed colder than simply signed-inclined anyone on “conventional” communities such as for example evangelical Christians, Republicans and followers of the conventional loved ones. Search consistently suggests that liberals are more open than simply conservatives, but in most cases what matters is: Open to just what?

Knowing all of this, will we change endurance profile? You imagine the notice-broadening enterprise away from knowledge perform dump prejudice. However, based on some other presentation on SPSP conference, it does not. It does, however, show men and women to protection it. Maxine Najle, a researcher from the College or university regarding Kentucky, expected someone if they create envision voting to own a presidential candidate who had been atheist, black colored, Catholic, gay, Muslim or a female. Whenever asked physically, professionals that have a studies beyond high school claimed a greater desire so you can vote for these teams than simply performed reduced-educated people. But once requested inside the a far more secondary means, with an increase of privacy, the two teams demonstrated equivalent prejudice. “So advanced schooling generally seems to instill an understanding of appropriate amounts of intolerance to express,” Najle informed me, “not always higher tolerance.”

இந்நூல் சுயமுன்னேற்ற நூல்களின் வரிசையில் பயனுள்ள, போற்றத்தக்க ஒரு புதுவரவு. பற்றாக்குறையோடு கூடிய அன்றாட வாழ்க்கையான இக்கரை வாழ்க்கையிலிருந்து சிறந்த, அபரிமிதமான அக்கரை வாழ்க்கைக்கு பயணிக்க ஒரு சிறந்த வழிக்காட்டி.

 வாழ்க்கையில் முன்னேற விழையும் எல்லோருடைய வெற்றிக்கும் இந்நூல் ஒரு திறவுகோலாக விளங்கும் என்பது திண்ணம்.
பல்வேறு பணிகளுக்கிடையே மக்களுக்கு, குறிப்பாக இளைஞர்களுக்கு மிகவும் அவசியமான இந்நூலை அழகான, எளிய தமிழ்நடையில் இயற்றி அளித்த ஆசிரியருக்கு பாராட்டுக்கள். அவர் பணி மேலும் சிறக்கட்டும்!

 

Dr.R.S.Raghavan
Dr.R.S.Raghavan

ஒரு நல்ல புத்தகத்தின் அடையாளம் படிக்கத் தொடங்கியவுடன் கீழே வைக்காமல் கடைசிப் பக்கம் வரை படிக்க வைப்பதே. தங்களது “இக்கரையா? அக்கரையா?” என்ற புத்தகம் எனக்கு அந்த அனுபவத்தைத் தந்தது. இது மிகவும் அருமையான சுயமுன்னேற்ற வகை புத்தகம்.

தொழில் முறையில் ஆடிட்டராக உள்ள நீங்கள் அருமையாக ஆங்கிலத்தில் எழுத முடியுமென்றாலும், தமிழ் வாசகர்களுக்குப் புதிய சிந்தனைகளைத் தரவேண்டும் என்பதற்காகவே இந்த நூலைத் தமிழில் எழுதியிருக்கிறீர்கள். அதனால் தமிழ் வாசகர்களின் நன்றிக்குரியவராகிறீர்கள்.

ஒரு வாசகன் என்ற முறையில், உங்களுக்கு என் பாராட்டையும், நன்றியையும் தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறேன்.

Padmashri. Dr. Nalli Kuppuswami Chetti
Padmashri. Dr. Nalli Kuppuswami Chetti(Partner M/S. Nalli Chinnasami Chetty)

திரு.ஈ.பி.திருமலை தொழில் துறையில் தனக்கென ஓர் இடத்தைப்பெற்றவர். அவரது முயற்சியும் மனித பண்பாடும் அவரை வெற்றியின் உச்சத்தை அடைய உதவியது. முற்போக்கான சிந்தனை, முரண்பாடற்ற நோக்கம், எதிலும் யதார்த்தத்தையும் உண்மையையும் உணரக்கூடிய அறிவு இவைகள் இவரது அடிப்படை ஆற்றல்கள். 

அவரது 40 ஆண்டுகளுக்கும் மேற்பட்ட அனுபவங்களின் தெள்ளிய சாராம்சம்தான் இவரது படைப்பு ‘இக்கரையா? அக்கரையா?’

சுவைபட எழுதியிருக்கிறார். அறிவுப்பூர்வமான புத்தகங்களின் நடுவில் இப்புத்தகம் தனித்து மிளிரும் என்பதில் எந்தவித ஐயமும் இல்லை. திரு.ஈ.பி.திருமலை அவர்களது இம்முயற்சி பாராட்டத்தக்கது. அவர்களுக்கு மனப்பூர்வமான வாழ்த்துக்கள்!

Shri. V.V.Sundaram
Shri. V.V.Sundaram(Cleveland Thyagaraja Festival)